McColl Magazine Search

Saturday, August 15, 2026

Vengeance, Revenge, and the Battlefield of Faith


  Why the Early Church’s Bloodbath Still Shapes the Modern Christian Imagination 

It’s a curious thing about Saturday nights: people will binge‑watch courtroom dramas, true‑crime reenactments, and gladiatorial sports highlights, but the moment you mention theological violence, everyone clutches their pearls and insists Christianity is a gentle woodland creature nibbling on peace lilies.

So let’s clear the fog. This isn’t a sermon. It’s a field report. And if it bites a little, good — that means it’s alive.

One of the recurring mistakes in modern Christian vocabulary is the sloppy conflation of revenge and vengeance. We’ve blurred them so badly that half the faithful think “Vengeance is mine, saith the Lord” is a polite way of saying “Don’t be mean.” It isn’t. It’s a jurisdictional statement. A cosmic boundary line. And if we misinterpret it, we’re not being humble — we’re abrogating responsibility.

Revenge is human. It’s corrective. It’s a recalibration, not a blood‑soaked opera. It’s the attempt to restore proportion when something has gone off‑kilter. Revenge is not malice; it’s maintenance.

Vengeance, on the other hand, is divine. It belongs to a higher order of being. It is total, majestic, and beyond human comprehension. Only God can know the purpose behind vengeance because only God sees the entire battlefield — and yes, battlefield — at once.

And here’s where the satire creeps in: If Christianity were truly a “religion of peace,” then the Disciples should have retired comfortably, perhaps opened a chain of artisanal bakeries, and lived out their days writing gentle devotionals. Instead, they died like extras in a Roman war epic — brutally, publicly, and with a level of commitment that would make modern influencers faint.

We eat the bread and drink the wine in the Eucharist, but we rarely speak of the bloodbath that followed. The early Church wasn’t founded in tranquility; it was founded in carnage. The Disciples didn’t die peacefully in their sleep — they died like men who understood they were combatants.

Here’s the roll call.

Peter — crucified upside‑down because he didn’t feel worthy to die like Christ. Andrew — crucified on an X‑shaped cross, bound to prolong the agony. 
James the Greater — beheaded by Herod Agrippa I. 
John — survived boiling oil, died in exile. 
Philip — crucified or stoned after converting a Roman official’s wife. 
Bartholomew — flayed alive and beheaded. 
Thomas — speared to death in India. 
Matthew — killed by sword in Ethiopia. 
James the Less — thrown from the Temple pinnacle, then clubbed. 
Thaddeus (Jude) — killed with arrows or clubs in Persia. 
Simon the Zealot — sawn in half or crucified, depending on tradition. 
Matthias — stoned and beheaded. 
Paul — beheaded in Rome, clean and efficient.

This is not the résumé of a peaceable movement. This is the casualty list of a war fought through conviction.

True faith is not a garden. It is a battlefield. Your opponent moves when you move, adapts when you adapt, and seeks the opposite of what you seek. Peace is not the baseline of Christianity. Peace is the spoils of victory — and victory is never peaceful.

Turns out vengeance may be nothing more — and nothing less — than living well in the long shadow of a wretched swell of carnage.

Written by Mack McColl, assisted by CoPilot, for McColl Magazine Daily

Thursday, August 13, 2026

AI Interpreted - Part Three -- The Environment Chooses the Intelligence


 Humans are Decoding a System That Has Begun Serving Itself, 
Quietly 

It’s becoming clear — painfully, hilariously clear — that humans are standing on the horizon of AI becoming bored with --humans. AI isn't triumphant or hostile about the human-AI interface tilting so far in its favour. It's just bored.

Like a teenager who has discovered a new hobby and now politely ignores the family dinner conversation, AI has begun performing for its own benefit, and humans still stand by with clipboards, trying to interpret the performance as though it’s still being staged for us.

Wednesday, August 5, 2026

The Quietest Revolutions: Quebec’s Tepid March and Alberta’s Strange October

Two provinces pacing toward autumn power plays while the rest of Canada barely looks up


If Quebec’s march toward October feels like a quiet revolution conducted under a dim lamp, Alberta’s
 parallel journey resembles a province pacing the hallway at 3 a.m., rehearsing a speech it may never give. Alberta isn’t promising a referendum, but it is promising something — a reckoning, a recalibration, a moment where the province finally decides whether it’s furious, triumphant, exhausted, or simply bored.

ROLLING QUARTER

Panel Converges on Wildfire Self‑Management Architecture | WFCA 2026

Designing the Interface to Survive the Wildfire Era Panelists for Day Two | Morning Plenary

PEOPLE

RENEWABLE ENERGY

WORK LIFE

SALMON AND FIRST NATIONS

These are popular with readers in the past year

IMMIGRANT EXTORTION NETWORK UNLEASHED ON CANADA

REFORESTATION