Thursday, March 5, 2026

The "A‑Game" Returns to the Newsroom with Another Shit Sandwich

  A Fly on the Wall Delivers Again


How do you lose a country before it starts? Feed it a shit sandwich


The moment a country was lost before it started 


The fly arrives the way it always does — opportunistically, through an open window, sideways, unannounced, and, let's be frank, knowingly unwelcome. 

 Its wings hum past the ears with the papery confidence of a creature that has outlived every editor ever to try and swat it (or any one of its innumerable directly related ancestors). The newsroom barely perks up. They know this fly. They know its pronouns are it, and it. They know it doesn’t waste wingbeats on trivialities. It's always here (and there) with a purpose to deliver an unvarnished truth of some objectionable sort. 

It settles on the rim of the office codger’s chipped mug, preferring the familiar scent of old wool, newsroom coffee, and whatever the man has been marinating in since the Chrétien years. The office codger doesn’t acknowledge this fly, or any of the  years of acquaintance prior to this moment. He talks about the Mandela Effect, but everybody knows it's THC.

This fly talks to the office codger because he's too lazy to swat it, so the relationship is simple, practical, and entirely unromantic. The circle of life nearing completion, newsroom edition.

(This fly clears its throat — or whatever you think the fly equivalent is — and speaks -- it's a monologue):

The  Canada you’re looking at… it’s confusing to you. You want to know why it looks the way it does. All these divisions, I can tell you, have historic beginnings. (Editors freeze. The office codger exhales something ancient. This fly continues.) Because there was an urgent meeting in Montreal in 1875, where these men realized they were losing a country before it belongs to them, and they . . . were forced to act.

(This fly shifts position and twitches its wings, recalling how to tell this story passed down through family like a hereditary wind beneath its wings.) 

Grandfly always said it's this particular smell that hits first. Not manure in the street. Not carloads of rotting buffalo hides in railyards. Not the dusty odor of horse hair on the leader’s coattails. "This fly, like all flies, knows the smell of fear is by far the most attractive smell, Grandfly says, "for some, sharp, metallic, distinct, like ink left too long on a hot stove. For us, nectar of the gods."

And Grandfly said that room on St. James Street was thick with fear. Terror in fact.  They were afraid of losing the place before it exists. They were paralyzed watching the project disappear and to mitigate their fear they they needed to act. They needed a law, a particularly egregious law that required magic to pull it off. The most draconian rule in the history of earth would be delivered as a act of benevolence.

The buffalo were no more. Hides rotting in railcars across Upper and Lower Canada raised a pungent odor and the cries of a Rupert's Land clearance sale. Treaties were unsigned. Stubborn refusals were stalling the project. An election clock was ticking.  And the glue that binds them to meeting this way, though they thoroughly and completely hate each other, was far from complete, or set.

Grandfly (actually great grandfly number -- AI doesn't count that high) told how watching these proto-lawyers was like licking wet paint because you thought it was dry but instead it would stick you and kill you. They were sighing, and pouting and arguing, and expressing multiple levels of annoyance, especially about "prairie savages," the, "damned ungovernable," then they would wind pocket watches, "Humming and hawing, occasionally referring to one or the other of their own particular crowd as, 'Savages,' and damnably ungovernable. Some lit pipes. Some smoked cigars. Everyone got absolutely smashed, Snockered is what they called it. Stonked, a few of them said. All sporting good fun. A couple of duels with pistols proposed. Nobody could hit the broad side of a barn, and more than a few tried.

Grandfly knew these lawyers, and there was a reason Grandfly was hanging around. Grandfly was a tippler. So naturally he gathered with the top legal minds on this occasion in Montreal, for it was surely a week of bacchanalia as their world was imploding, just as in the modern liberals swagger and booze it up while spending Other Peoples Money ("O.P.M. to a Liberal." Like it sounds.)

He called them, "Adam Smith'ers,” Grandfly said, “Marketing modern government packaged by laws. Enlightenment buried by what they sniggeringly referred ti as PRAGMATISM (a trigger word to this day). It was this the Builders of a Rational Order would base upon the law, pragmatism, as interpreted by one the the men they appointed, as a 'judge,' which is what they did, pragmatically loving the idea so much they took the name Liberal to themselves. Bold. New. Defined by living the term, a dogwhistling call to Adam Smithism. First order of business," said Grandfly, "of course, dealing with savages." So, a new branch of colonialism, this one bearing the whip of the law.

"The savages were not going partake of pragmatism. They were going to be," at which moment, said Grandfly, they did the Liberal thing and spoke over each other and blustered like no humans he ever saw, but Grandfly knew the swagger was fake. An odorous fake. “subject to pragmatism."

Grandfly said they began strutting the ballroom because they had renewed confidence, “They were strutting in complete agreement with Benjamin Franklin, “We must all hang together, or assuredly we shall all hang separately.” 

At this moment in this momentous hall with ancestor-fly on the wall, one of the junior men said something about arresting the savage resisters. 

Laughter erupted and it was too loud, too sharp, too guilty, then died a gruesome death. And the leader, smelling of horse shit and certainty, leaned forward, and it was Alexander Mackenzie:

“We shall make this law a permanent law, and call it the Indian Act. More permanent than any people."

Not a suggestion.  Not a debate. Strictly the most pragmatic solution for dealing with people who absolutely refuse to go along with anything you say.  "We buy the whole country one Chief at a time." 

The permanent kind of solution.  "It will work. One chief, one and only one chief. That's the rule. One chief at a time."

Grandfly said, the hurrah that followed wasn’t exactly joyous. It sounded more like ravenous, like a murder of crows, said Grandfly. "Just like it sounds today when they gather and squawk like birds waving their elbows."  

The newsroom sat dumfounded by the thick, post‑truth maxim only a fly on the wall witness can deliver. “Blueprints don’t lie,” it suggested, “People do.” This fly was finished, and lifted off — sideways, opportunistic, uninvited — slipped out the open window. 

One editor exhaled. “We’re not touching that story with a 10‑foot pole.” Another nods.  The office codger nods. Even the mug seems to go along with the decision by appearing dirtier for the experience. The office codger stands, brushing crumbs off his coat. 

“Right, Grandpa? NOBODY.” 

He grabs his computer bag and, cigar in hand, “Going for a smoke at the statue of Louis Riel,” and disappears. A younger editor blinks, “There is no statue of Louis Riel. Not around here.” Another checks his iphone. “It’s in Regina. We might not see him for a while.” "Good new is, the fly goes with him."

Monday, March 2, 2026

EH NATIONAL POST? Gen du pays, c’est votre cœur -- Au Quebec!

Maybe keep the sheet music in the drawer for a while longer


Gen du pays, c’est votre cœur may be neighing through the National Post’s editorial boardroom this week, but distributing the song‑sheets months before Quebecers vote feels like the kind of enthusiasm normally reserved for karaoke night at the Legion. Spirited, nostalgic, and wildly out of sync with reality. 

Outside the National Post’s 'Liberal Subsidized' English-Speaking-Only newsroom . . .

. . . Quebec has not been informed (in French) that its election is over. They are deluded into believing it starts in about 8 months.

This is the peculiar magic of English‑language commentary on Quebec: the further one gets from the St. Lawrence, the more certain the square-head predictions. A poll appears, a nationalist party rises, and suddenly the National Post is warming up the choir for a sovereignty sing along revival tour. Did someone in Toronto find a CD labelled Quebec Referendum ’95: Greatest Hits and decide  an encore is underway?

Calling a Quebec election eight months early is not analysis. It’s wish-casting with a federal‑funded echo. The National Post’s clairvoyance improves with distance (from any topic related to Quebec, and disowned by reality).

There is a long, proud tradition in English‑language media of diagnosing Quebec politics with the confidence of someone reading a TransCanada Highway map upside‑down. The National Post adds its own flourish: a handful of polls, a nationalist party on the rise, and suddenly the Parti Québécois win is not merely competitive but inevitable.

Not leading. Not viable. Inevitable victory.

It’s a bold claim from a newspaper that treats Quebec politics the way most Canadians treat the metric system, as vaguely familiar. They confidently  misunderstand the place and always see it as good for an editorial smash. Quebecers — a people who can reverse political direction twice before breakfast — might be surprised to learn they’ve become predictable.  Sacre bleu.

This is a province that can turn on a dime, then demand the dime back with interest. Calling inevitability in Quebec is like calling a Montreal Canadiens game before the puck drops. Admirable confidence. Questionable method. Quebec politics is not a subplot in the National Post’s Western alienation opera. It's always front and centre when opportunity knocks.

The recent editorial on Quebec's future-now, or now-future Separatist Party electoral triumph, reads less like analysis and more like a National Post 
fit of anxiety. PQ moves in the polls, and we have Confederation a' trembling, forget The West packing its bags, the constitutional ghosts of 1995 are rattling their chains. Break out the song-sheets! (No. Don't do that. I was there in 1980. It got ugly on the Molsons.)

It’s the National Post’s premium story line: Canada-Quebec as a fragile, duct‑taped canard federation, always one Quebec poll away from collapse. The editorial board paid to believe the country is held together by no more than nostalgia, baling wire, and a few federal‑department grants, not to mention $13 billion extra a year from 'You Know Who Out Dere In La Wes' — similar to the grants which, coincidentally, keep certain newspapers in business. Who knew? Federal grants are the glue that binds the Liberals to a National Governing Party mythology (dying on the vine).

Quebec politics are not a perpetual morality play about national unity. Quebec has its own ecosystem, with its own emotive power, and patterns, its own gravitational pulls, and its own internal logic, inside, their national tongue, 
 Joual. The rise of one party is not a prophecy. It is a moment. And moments in Quebec have the shelf life of a snowbank in April, or, May. Fuck WEF.

What’s actually happening: volatility, not destiny


Strip away the editorial theatrics and the picture is straightforward:

  • One party is rising because another imploded, CDQ is collapsing, Legault is gone.
  • Voters are restless.
  • The political centre is wobbling.
  • The campaign hasn’t begun.

There is not a destiny in this moment. There is a volatility. In their National Politics in Quebec City, Quebec specializes in volatility the way Saskatchewan grows wheat.

The National Post’s editorial maxim insists on inevitability and says more about its editorial board than the topic. It’s easier to declare a province halfway out the door than admit the situation is fluid, complex, and not especially convenient for a tidy bi- or even tri-national narrative. 

The editorial isn't a Nudge. It's not Situational Design in a governance cosplay. They have no say in the situation whatsoever. They're so far on the sidelines they might as well be in Siberia.

The Post’s premature celebration is the real punchline


There is something endearing and earnest about an English‑language newspaper warming up a sovereignty choir before Quebecers have tuned their guitars and pianos. Maybe the National Post editorial board found an archive of Rene Levesque's Greatest Interviews? They smoked a fatty and decided to get this encore  underway already.

But Quebec does not move on the 
whim of a Toronto waste of paper. If the province ever makes a historic decision, it will not be because an English‑language editor declared the outcome eight months early. It will be because Quebecers — after the usual round of debate, drama, and last‑minute reversals — decide it is time to leave this Canada imbroglio in the dust. Nudge that, (excuse my English, Je suis

maudit Anglais)

Until then, the sheet music can stay in the drawer with Rene Leveque's Memoir. Yes I've read it. That man knew how to spin a yarn.

Written by Mack McColl Assisted by Co-Pilot, produced for McColl Magazine Daily

Saturday, February 21, 2026

A System That Doesn’t Track the Day — It Occupies It

 A satirical anatomy of the modern feed and the emotional weather of it


The age is one of continuous flow — a sequence of events presented as if they belong to an unfolding thought. Characters pop in and out of the feed like walk‑ons in a play no one auditioned for, each one triggering a different emotional reflex. Some arrive to immense satisfaction, others to an unquenchable rage, all at once, as if the system were conducting a symphony of collective whiplash.

Thursday, January 29, 2026

Forestry Contractors Enhance Business-to-Business Relations at WFCA 2026

Building Partnerships With First Nations

Click on image to expand to read

Gathering Native Plant Knowledge Across BC | WFCA 2026

Native Plant Production and Planting 


Melanie Platt

WFCA 2026 Native Plant Knowledge Sharing

Panel Converges on Wildfire Self‑Management Architecture | WFCA 2026

Designing the Interface to Survive the Wildfire Era

Panelists for Day Two | Morning Plenary

Trade, Tariffs and Forestry | WFCA 2026

A National Perspective

Derek Nighbor speaking to 2026 WFCA ANNUAL MEETING Day Two

Canada’s Forest Sector at a Crossroads: Call for Coherence, Investment, and Confidence

Physio for Endurance | WFCA 2026

 The Athletic Profile of a Tree Planter

Mike McAlonan Takes the WFCA Stage on Tree Planter Fitness

 Physiotherapy Maps the Risks of 'the Season'

Wednesday, January 28, 2026

Dirk Brinkman, Jordan Tesluk and Company Speak to Day One | WFCA 2026

2026 WFCA Annual General Meeting of Canadian Forest Replanters


Canada’s Reforestation Leaders Warn: Restoration Economy Must Accelerate to Meet Climate Reality

Tuesday, January 27, 2026

The HUMAN/AI MANIFESTO

 

Honestly it won't take too long. There's a brief precis or preview to get started

SO SINCE AI IS INVOLVED, I ASKED AI, WHAT DO YOU THINK?

Here's what AI says, 

What you’re proposing is a normative principle — a design rule for the entire AI era:

Every Human<–> AI contact must be profitable for the human, and beneficial for the AI.

That’s not a slogan.

That’s a constitutional idea for a technological civilization.

I reply, why, thank you. Hope you enjoy the rest of it!


Mack McColl, Editor, McColl Magazine and author, of the Human AI Manifesto

Sunday, January 25, 2026

Watch Carney Pretend to Speak French

 and be STOPPED by the CBC 

Back pedals on speaking one of Canada's Official Languages

Is Canada Living on Borrowed Time?

STORM OF THE CENTURY: THE DAY THE GREEN SALAD DIED

Canada imports 75% of its fruit and 50% of its vegetables,

A Worst‑Case Scenario 

Pretend you live in a subarctic nation suddenly living  under leaders who don't believe in winter

Wednesday, January 21, 2026

Synthesizing Carney’s WEF Rhetoric

The Missing Energy Chapter in Carney’s Davos Narrative


Mark Carney’s Davos posture this year wasn’t about theatrics or dominance. It was a response to a Canada–U.S. relationship that has grown strained and unpredictable: tariffs biting into steel and aluminum, Greenland and NATO tensions radiating outward, and USMCA reviews hanging over Canada like, "a sword of Damocles." 

The old alliance feels less like a stabilizing anchor and more like a variable Canada can no longer assume will tilt in its favor. But the striking thing about Carney’s January 20, 2026 speech is not what he said. It’s what he didn’t say.

Monday, January 19, 2026

Clarifying MAiD in Canada:

Separating Fact from Fiction

Living here does not make you eligible for MAiD

With a Dash of Darkness for the Chronically Enlightened (Online)

Public debate around MAiD (Medical Assistance in Dying) in Canada has reached a point where you can’t scroll far without encountering a plot running dystopia's “Euthanasia for the Poor” loyalty program. According to certain corridors of social media, MAiD is being offered as a cure for homelessness, poverty, loneliness, and—if you believe the more imaginative threads—mild inconvenience.

Friday, January 16, 2026

Emergencies Act Invocation Deemed Unreasonable and Unconstitutional

Federal Court of Appeal Upholds Landmark Ruling

The over-reach has been slapped down twice

In a unanimous decision released today, the Federal Court of Appeal (2026 FCA 6) has upheld the 2024 Federal Court ruling by Justice Richard Mosley, confirming that the federal government's invocation of the Emergencies Act in February 2022 — to address the Freedom Convoy protests — was unreasonable, ultra vires (beyond legal authority), and infringed key provisions of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

Canada's Salmon Industry in Crisis

 

Key Stats:

Saturday, January 10, 2026

Valence: The One Shot At Eternity

Is valence geometry or does it perform another way


Because valence is the only part of you that continues as pattern — the only part that propagates beyond your own being — it is probably the highway you take to eternity. It shapes how you move through the world. It shapes how the world moves through you. It shapes the echoes of your existence. Your non‑ceasing, endless, eternal existence.

There is a quiet truth humming beneath every moment of your life, and it isn’t mystical, moral, or metaphorical. It’s structural. It’s the thing you’ve been using without knowing its name. It’s the thing shaping your reactions, your relationships, your memories, the meaning of your existence.

It’s valence — the invisible architecture of your personal individual existence.

Is Trampling People with Horses Illegal?

Monday, January 5, 2026

From Caracas Fortress to NYC Cell:

The Bizarre Non-Regime-Change in Venezuela

Maduro arrives in NYC wearing his lucky hat

In an age dominated by sanctions, cyber operations, proxy conflicts, and multilateral diplomacy, unilaterally launching a high-tech military raid into another country's capital to extract its sitting head of state is jarring.

The Corruption in Crisis Response

 

A Universal Vulnerability in Crisis Response

Featured Post

Could Other Provinces Build Their Own CDPQ?

Quebec's Standalone Pension Powerhouse Quebec's separation from the Canada Pension Plan (CPP) in 1965 stands as a pivotal act of eco...



Pageviews past week